Red Dot sights - opinions?
- Combat Controller
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5187
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 12:03 am
Re: Red Dot sights - opinions?
I will be the voice of caution on Swamp Fox, I bought one (Oleg Volk had recommended it) and it is HEAVY (I have 56mm scopes a foot long that weigh less), the edges have distortion (they claim it is so the center of the optic is more clear) the casting is rough and just an overall disappointing optic. It feels very "Chinese" . It works but... I want my $300 back. I love Trijicon because no batteries (I have maybe 6) and Sig makes a real good red dot. I also am liking the HoloSun I bought for the MP 17. I think the solar backup is neat. YMMV but I DO NOT like the swamp fox. I say skip the tube unless you are getting a variable like a 1-6 etc.
Winner of the prestigious Автомат Калашникова образца 1947 года award for excellence in rural travel.
- Combat Controller
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5187
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 12:03 am
Re: Red Dot sights - opinions?
That said I have the blade, the others may be just fine.
https://www.swampfoxoptics.com/blade-1x25-prism
https://www.swampfoxoptics.com/blade-1x25-prism
Winner of the prestigious Автомат Калашникова образца 1947 года award for excellence in rural travel.
-
- Posts: 5272
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 6:01 pm
Re: Red Dot sights - opinions?
older swampfox products are well older optics. They started out as a chinese optic maker looking to create a brand with Americans designing new products. The originals were examples similar to the products they OEM'ed for others (not close to the high end of the middle). Their newer products are much better in almost every way and MOST are very good for the money spent.Combat Controller wrote: ↑Mon Nov 23, 2020 10:05 pm I will be the voice of caution on Swamp Fox, I bought one (Oleg Volk had recommended it) and it is HEAVY (I have 56mm scopes a foot long that weigh less), the edges have distortion (they claim it is so the center of the optic is more clear) the casting is rough and just an overall disappointing optic. It feels very "Chinese" . It works but... I want my $300 back. I love Trijicon because no batteries (I have maybe 6) and Sig makes a real good red dot. I also am liking the HoloSun I bought for the MP 17. I think the solar backup is neat. YMMV but I DO NOT like the swamp fox. I say skip the tube unless you are getting a variable like a 1-6 etc.
Are they US Optics, Nightforce, Ior Valdada... not even close. Are they more scope than you should get at the price point. Usually and often by a fair amount.
"Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." ~Thomas Jefferson
My little part of the blogosphere. http://blogletitburn.wordpress.com/
My little part of the blogosphere. http://blogletitburn.wordpress.com/
- HTRN
- Posts: 12401
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 3:05 am
Re: Red Dot sights - opinions?
Holosuns seem to be providing the best bang for your buck at the moment.
HTRN, I would tell you that you are an evil fucker, but you probably get that a lot ~ Netpackrat
Describing what HTRN does as "antics" is like describing the wreck of the Titanic as "a minor boating incident" ~ First Shirt
Describing what HTRN does as "antics" is like describing the wreck of the Titanic as "a minor boating incident" ~ First Shirt
- Combat Controller
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5187
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 12:03 am
Re: Red Dot sights - opinions?
Problem is I bought it 4 months ago. It's brand new.Precision wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 1:06 pmolder swampfox products are well older optics. They started out as a chinese optic maker looking to create a brand with Americans designing new products. The originals were examples similar to the products they OEM'ed for others (not close to the high end of the middle). Their newer products are much better in almost every way and MOST are very good for the money spent.Combat Controller wrote: ↑Mon Nov 23, 2020 10:05 pm I will be the voice of caution on Swamp Fox, I bought one (Oleg Volk had recommended it) and it is HEAVY (I have 56mm scopes a foot long that weigh less), the edges have distortion (they claim it is so the center of the optic is more clear) the casting is rough and just an overall disappointing optic. It feels very "Chinese" . It works but... I want my $300 back. I love Trijicon because no batteries (I have maybe 6) and Sig makes a real good red dot. I also am liking the HoloSun I bought for the MP 17. I think the solar backup is neat. YMMV but I DO NOT like the swamp fox. I say skip the tube unless you are getting a variable like a 1-6 etc.
Are they US Optics, Nightforce, Ior Valdada... not even close. Are they more scope than you should get at the price point. Usually and often by a fair amount.
Winner of the prestigious Автомат Калашникова образца 1947 года award for excellence in rural travel.