why arent there any current auto loaders in .30-06?
is .308, .223 or 7.62x39 really that much better?
why no .30-06?
- mekender
- Posts: 13189
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 9:31 pm
why no .30-06?
“I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democrat Party has adopted our platform.” - Norman Thomas, a six time candidate for president for the Socialist Party, 1944
-
- Posts: 1466
- Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:21 pm
Re: why no .30-06?
Winchester Super X is another abailable in '06.
- First Shirt
- Posts: 4378
- Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:32 pm
Re: why no .30-06?
Remington also offers a 30-06 autoloader. It's not a bad little item, and is (or was) available in carbine versions as well.
But there ain't many troubles that a man caint fix, with seven hundred dollars and a thirty ought six."
Lindy Cooper Wisdom
Lindy Cooper Wisdom
Re: why no .30-06?
Remington makes the 742 and the 7400 and the 740A, all semis in 30.06.
- Darrell
- Posts: 6586
- Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:12 pm
Re: why no .30-06?
Russian American Armory Company shows the Saiga 100 on their website:
http://www.raacfirearms.com/Saiga_100.htm
It's available in .30-06, but only comes with a three round magazine--it's billed as a hunting rifle. It is an AK action, of course. Might be fun to dress up, though I wonder what a guy could use for high cap mags. I don't recall seeing the Saiga 100 advertised anywhere, though.
ETA: Here is an interesting write-up on the gun. Evidently they are or were available in the States.
http://forum.saiga-12.com/index.php?showtopic=14684
http://www.raacfirearms.com/Saiga_100.htm
It's available in .30-06, but only comes with a three round magazine--it's billed as a hunting rifle. It is an AK action, of course. Might be fun to dress up, though I wonder what a guy could use for high cap mags. I don't recall seeing the Saiga 100 advertised anywhere, though.
ETA: Here is an interesting write-up on the gun. Evidently they are or were available in the States.
http://forum.saiga-12.com/index.php?showtopic=14684
Eppur si muove--Galileo
-
- Posts: 1840
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 5:04 am
Re: why no .30-06?
After the real BAR (M1918) and the M1 Garand, there was no point
- Kommander
- Posts: 3761
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:13 am
Re: why no .30-06?
Given the similarity between the .30-06 and .308 there isn't really any point.
- mekender
- Posts: 13189
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 9:31 pm
Re: why no .30-06?
Kommander wrote:Given the similarity between the .30-06 and .308 there isn't really any point.
so how much of a difference is there between the two?
perhaps the better question, why do they both exist if they are so similar?
“I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democrat Party has adopted our platform.” - Norman Thomas, a six time candidate for president for the Socialist Party, 1944
- Kommander
- Posts: 3761
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:13 am
Re: why no .30-06?
The .308, or more properly 7.62x51, was a post WWII outgrowth of the .30-06 cartridge. It was discovered that by using new powders, performance similar to a .30-06 round could be had but in a shorter cartridge. This allowed the guns and magazines to be smaller and lighter and take less material to manufacture while still having that "Battle Rifle" performance.mekender wrote:Kommander wrote:Given the similarity between the .30-06 and .308 there isn't really any point.
so how much of a difference is there between the two?
perhaps the better question, why do they both exist if they are so similar?
- mekender
- Posts: 13189
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 9:31 pm
Re: why no .30-06?
ahhh ha ... as someone that does not own any centerfire rifles yet, things sometimes dont add up... i havent had much exposure to rifle shooting first hand...
“I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democrat Party has adopted our platform.” - Norman Thomas, a six time candidate for president for the Socialist Party, 1944