US tests laser weapons?

A place to talk about all things military, paramilitary, tactical, strategic, and logistical.
User avatar
Denis
Posts: 6570
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 5:29 am

US tests laser weapons?

Post by Denis »

N. Korean missile fails seconds after launch. I wonder if the US just live-tested a laser weapon?

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/03/21/asia/ ... sile-test/
User avatar
randy
Posts: 8334
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:33 pm
Location: EM79VQ

Re: US tests laser weapons?

Post by randy »

Denis wrote:. I wonder if the US just live-tested a laser weapon?
Possible, but I don't think so. I am unable (or at least unwilling) to get into why I make that assessment.
...even before I read MHI, my response to seeing a poster for the stars of the latest Twilight movies was "I see 2 targets and a collaborator".
User avatar
Denis
Posts: 6570
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 5:29 am

Re: US tests laser weapons?

Post by Denis »

There you go again, neither confirming nor denying :-)
User avatar
Denis
Posts: 6570
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 5:29 am

Re: US tests laser weapons?

Post by Denis »

[tinfoil hat] It occurs to me that the USAF X37-B space plane is aloft at the moment, secretly doing secretive things...[/tinfoil hat]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_X-37#OTV-4

http://www.space.com/9940-secretive-spa ... t-37b.html

http://heavens-above.com/orbit.aspx?satid=40651
BDK
Posts: 1698
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2014 11:14 pm

Re: US tests laser weapons?

Post by BDK »

Physics pretty well says no.

A "rod from god" is far more practical, though it would be more destructive, I think, unless quite small.

I know that a nuke can destroy a chemical/biological weapons depot, as the thermal front passes the pressure front - is that inherent to being a nuke, or would a large enough rod be able to do the same thing?
User avatar
Vonz90
Posts: 4731
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 4:05 pm

Re: US tests laser weapons?

Post by Vonz90 »

Denis wrote:N. Korean missile fails seconds after launch. I wonder if the US just live-tested a laser weapon?

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/03/21/asia/ ... sile-test/
Atmospheric beam weapons are mostly all short range (that I know of anyway). The diffusion in the atmosphere makes them loose power rapidly. There has been some work on x-ray lasers to get around this, but I do not think they have come up with anything practical.
User avatar
Denis
Posts: 6570
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 5:29 am

Re: US tests laser weapons?

Post by Denis »

BDK wrote:A "rod from god" is far more practical
I was indeed also wondering whether the X37-B might not be an experimental Thor platform. The problem would be getting the time on target right, as opposed to a laser/lightspeed weapon. OTOH, I suppose the locations of the NorK's launch testing sites are well known to the USAF.
User avatar
First Shirt
Posts: 4378
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:32 pm

Re: US tests laser weapons?

Post by First Shirt »

Denis wrote: OTOH, I suppose the locations of the NorK's launch testing sites are well known to the USAF.
Why, Denis! What on earth would make you think something like that?
But there ain't many troubles that a man caint fix, with seven hundred dollars and a thirty ought six."
Lindy Cooper Wisdom
User avatar
evan price
Posts: 1912
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 10:24 am

Re: US tests laser weapons?

Post by evan price »

Or maybe the Norks don't have better Germans.
Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc

http://ohioccwforums.org/
Ohioans for Concealed Carry:THE source for Ohio CCW information and discussion!
User avatar
HTRN
Posts: 12397
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 3:05 am

Re: US tests laser weapons?

Post by HTRN »

BDK wrote:Physics pretty well says no.

A "rod from god" is far more practical, though it would be more destructive, I think, unless quite small.

I know that a nuke can destroy a chemical/biological weapons depot, as the thermal front passes the pressure front - is that inherent to being a nuke, or would a large enough rod be able to do the same thing?
You forgot the Casaba howitzer option, although theyre not nearly as impressive in orbit to surface applications.
HTRN, I would tell you that you are an evil fucker, but you probably get that a lot ~ Netpackrat

Describing what HTRN does as "antics" is like describing the wreck of the Titanic as "a minor boating incident" ~ First Shirt
Post Reply