RIMPAC 2016 SINKEX of Decommissioned USS Thach (FFG 43)

A place to talk about all things military, paramilitary, tactical, strategic, and logistical.
Greg
Posts: 8486
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:15 pm

Re: RIMPAC 2016 SINKEX of Decommissioned USS Thach (FFG 43)

Post by Greg »

That torpedo went off more or less under the missile magazine.

Stripped ship means no fire, no secondary explosions, etc.

And if the sea weren't so calm, no doubt the ends of the ship would work a little more and, well, detach.
Maybe we're just jaded, but your villainy is not particularly impressive. -Ennesby

If you know what you're doing, you're not learning anything. -Unknown
Sanity is the process by which you continually adjust your beliefs so they are predictively sound. -esr
User avatar
Cybrludite
Posts: 5048
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:13 am

Re: RIMPAC 2016 SINKEX of Decommissioned USS Thach (FFG 43)

Post by Cybrludite »

Mike OTDP wrote:I'd bet good odds the missiles had dummy warheads. Targets are scarce, they try to keep them afloat as long as possible.
And don't forget that the Exocet that burned the Sheffield during the Falklands War had a dud warhead. The fire that sank her was from the missile's fuel.
"If it ain't the Devil's Music, you ain't doin' it right." - Chris Thomas King

"When liberal democracies collapse, someone comes along who promises to make the trains run on time if we load the right people into them." - Tam K.
User avatar
mekender
Posts: 13189
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 9:31 pm

Re: RIMPAC 2016 SINKEX of Decommissioned USS Thach (FFG 43)

Post by mekender »

Jericho941 wrote:
Precision wrote:I have to say I was not impressed with the damage done by 2 anti ship missiles and a torpedo. I would have expected a sunk ship. That ship was still VERY usable assuming the engines (etc) would still run.
Look at the way the flight deck and hangar were busted up, and check out this diagram. I'm guessing engine power is out of the question.

The torpedo also seems to have settled any notion of using the missile launcher (if it still had one).
I would guess that the first hit, the one to the hull, would have penetrated most of the way through the compartments in the middle of the ship. With a full warhead, that would have knocked out the ship right there.

The 2nd hit, would have taken out most of the CIC spaces.

The torpedo hit was probably on the bow on purpose, had it hit under the midships, it would have torn her in two. But with the bow being so narrow, much of its energy was dumped into the area of the sea that had nothing on top of it. Still the stress buckling was rather impressive.
“I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democrat Party has adopted our platform.” - Norman Thomas, a six time candidate for president for the Socialist Party, 1944
User avatar
Steamforger
Posts: 2785
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 5:41 pm

Re: RIMPAC 2016 SINKEX of Decommissioned USS Thach (FFG 43)

Post by Steamforger »

We used to call them "Little Grey Missile Sponges."
User avatar
blackeagle603
Posts: 9770
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:13 am

Re: RIMPAC 2016 SINKEX of Decommissioned USS Thach (FFG 43)

Post by blackeagle603 »

yeah, I remember of an action involving a Rockeye and an Israeli boat. Still afloat but completely denuded of anything useful topside -- a thorough and complete mission kill courtesy of all those little bomblets. Scoured the topside.
"The Guncounter: More fun than a barrel of tattooed knife-fighting chain-smoking monkey butlers with drinking problems and excessive gambling debts!"

"The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic;" Justice Story
toad
Posts: 2645
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 5:00 pm

Re: RIMPAC 2016 SINKEX of Decommissioned USS Thach (FFG 43)

Post by toad »

I remember a couple of decades ago the US Navy experimented with using the old unguided MLRS missiles on a target ship. It was nasty in that it pretty well stripped the antennas and stuff off the topside and would have probably killed a lot of crew. I think they gave up on it because of the high trajectory of the MLRS rockets and the guided low altitude missiles were in the pipe line.
Post Reply