The Russian Military Of 2014

A place to talk about all things military, paramilitary, tactical, strategic, and logistical.
Aesop
Posts: 6149
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 9:17 am

Re: The Russian Military Of 2014

Post by Aesop »

And in regard to the latest Putin vs. Obama go-arounds, this wisdom from the Book of Face:

"The last time a Russian beat a black man this bad, Apollo Creed died!"

:lol:

h/t to CommanderZero
"There are four types of homicide: felonious, accidental, justifiable, and praiseworthy." -Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"
User avatar
Cybrludite
Posts: 5048
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:13 am

Re: The Russian Military Of 2014

Post by Cybrludite »

Jerry Pournelle's take on the issue. Seems what I was thinking of as a fig leaf might actually be the brass ring...
"If it ain't the Devil's Music, you ain't doin' it right." - Chris Thomas King

"When liberal democracies collapse, someone comes along who promises to make the trains run on time if we load the right people into them." - Tam K.
User avatar
Erik
Posts: 3426
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 5:36 pm

Re: The Russian Military Of 2014

Post by Erik »

Aglifter wrote:Russia won't go near the Baltic. Lithuania, engaged in irregular warfare, alone, would cause no end of hell - and there are far too many there, who deeply, intensely , and for cause, hate Russia.
The Baltic states has an active IPSC scene. I'm told by people that has lived there and competed, that their rifle competitions are bigger than the handgun competitions, and people show up with any kind of rifle. Seeing oldtimers with a WW1 era rifle is not uncommon. Not that it necessarily translate to warfare skills, but it suggests that there are a lot of people there that have guns and know how to use them, and also get regular practice with them.

I have no real knowledge of russian military, but back when I did my service, the word was (from people that should have known) that the bulk of it was pretty poor quality. They had some impressive special forces and a few regular units they had for show, but most of it was poorly trained and poorly motivated conscripts, and the Soviet general attack plan was basically using overwhelming numbers. Not sure if that will do much good against irregular warfare, except provide a target rich environment.
"Life is tough, but it's tougher if you're stupid."
John Wayne
Rusty Ray
Posts: 468
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 4:01 pm

Re: The Russian Military Of 2014

Post by Rusty Ray »

Us Euros are fucked. Russia lets us have gas to keep us from freezing in the winter. Now that the trend is to turn off every bloody nuclear power station in case there is a tsunami and earthquake somewhere in the EU, that gas is needed even more. Not a very smart position to put us in. Thanks EU.

Britain 'may' back the US in any action that it would take. But having a POTUS that actively dislikes us as a people puts a big dampner on that. That Special Relationship? Well that's gone, dead. That knob in the Whitehouse has put paid to years of close cooperation and mutual respect. The double acts of Maggie/Gipper and Bliar/Clintoon seem a long, long time ago now. Does anybody out there see an BHO/Cameron love-in? No, though not.

Military wise, the latest thinking by the Brit.Gov. (get rid of everything- main battle tanks, harriers, pilots, whole battalions of seasoned troops, aircraft carriers etc etc) leaves our new 'lean, rapid and mission focused' forces next to fucking useless against anything other than religiously zealous hillmen. So any backing you might like from us, would be of questionable value anyway.

The boxheads are legally bound to their own soil for most things military AFAIK. Shame, they are a cat to Russia's dog.

So that leaves, wait for it....Your new best mates, the French. So no, I don't see the US geting much by way of anything other than transit bases from the Old World.


Cheers- Rusty
User avatar
blackeagle603
Posts: 9774
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:13 am

Re: The Russian Military Of 2014

Post by blackeagle603 »

Yeah, here's hoping an outcome of this includes a Germany that dumps it no-nuke power policy and goes whole hog with a Nuke plant construction program. In nearer term, let's hope for a US natural gas industry that turns into the net exporter that everyone keeps talking about as a possibility. Get those liquification plants running and you who'd like to profit watch for stock opportunities in midstream MLP's and LNG transport (e.g. GLNG).
"The Guncounter: More fun than a barrel of tattooed knife-fighting chain-smoking monkey butlers with drinking problems and excessive gambling debts!"

"The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic;" Justice Story
User avatar
Aglifter
Posts: 8212
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 12:15 am

Re: The Russian Military Of 2014

Post by Aglifter »

+1 - it's time for Houston to start running a "maritime" pipeline of LNG tankers...

An energy based Cold War could be a heck of a thing for TX...
And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm Reliance on the Protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our Fortunes, & our sacred Honor

A gentleman unarmed is undressed.

Collects of 1903/08 Colt Pocket Auto
Langenator
Posts: 1155
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 2:10 pm

Re: The Russian Military Of 2014

Post by Langenator »

Aglifter wrote:+1 - it's time for Houston to start running a "maritime" pipeline of LNG tankers...

An energy based Cold War could be a heck of a thing for TX...
And LA..and ND and Canada (provided the build the Keystone XL)
Fortuna Fortis Paratus
User avatar
blackeagle603
Posts: 9774
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:13 am

Re: The Russian Military Of 2014

Post by blackeagle603 »

a little bit of vision and leadership in DC would be nice. Of course that would require having adults in charge.


So would this idea about neutralizing Putin by leaning on the oligarchs in Russia.

emphasis added:
If the West punishes Russia with sanctions and a trade war, that might be effective eventually, but it would also be cruel to the 140 million Russians who live under Mr. Putin's rule. And it would be unnecessary.

Instead, sanction the 140 oligarchs who would dump Mr. Putin in the trash tomorrow if he cannot protect their assets abroad. Target their visas, their mansions and IPOs in London, their yachts and Swiss bank accounts. Use banks, not tanks.

Thursday, the U.S. announced such sanctions, but they must be matched by the European Union to be truly effective. Otherwise, Wall Street's loss is London's gain, and Mr. Putin's divide-and-conquer tactics work again.
"The Guncounter: More fun than a barrel of tattooed knife-fighting chain-smoking monkey butlers with drinking problems and excessive gambling debts!"

"The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic;" Justice Story
User avatar
Termite
Posts: 9003
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:32 am

Re: The Russian Military Of 2014

Post by Termite »

Aglifter wrote:+1 - it's time for Houston to start running a "maritime" pipeline of LNG tankers...
An energy based Cold War could be a heck of a thing for TX...
Ideally we don't want LNG plants & loading ports located anywhere near populous areas.

Sabine Pass, TX, Cameron/Johnson Bayou/Hackberry, LA are much better locations.
"Life is a bitch. Shit happens. Adapt, improvise, and overcome. Acknowledge it, and move on."
User avatar
Windy Wilson
Posts: 4875
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 5:32 am

Re: The Russian Military Of 2014

Post by Windy Wilson »

Termite wrote:Ideally we don't want LNG plants & loading ports located anywhere near populous areas.
I remember that discussion in the '80's about a LNG port in the central coast area away from even Pismo Beach.
The use of the word "but" usually indicates that everything preceding it in a sentence is a lie.
E.g.:
"I believe in Freedom of Speech, but". . .
"I support the Second Amendment, but". . .
--Randy
Post Reply