Netpackrat wrote:You keep saying how much you don't like him, but never provide any specific examples of things he has done that make him a scumbag/nazi. Each time you do this, I go read his stuff in an attempt to see for myself, and all I ever find are opinions that I mostly agree with.
These days he mostly goes on about SJWs and declares victory over them at every turn, sprinkled with the occasional grandiose tribute to himself as Dark Lord of something or other, spoken largely in /pol/ memes and buzzwords. But when it comes to actual politics, he's never subtle about his views.
Any time there is a "hate crime" against any minority, particularly the sort of crime in which the perpetrator is able to remain hidden, one can be relatively confident that the perpetrator is a member of that minority group and that the crime is a hoax.
The simple fact of the matter is that if you are not white, your nationality is not American and you are not part of the posterity for whom the Constitution was written. (Of course, if you are a white immigrant, or descendant of immigrants, you are not part of that posterity either.)
You may be a United States citizen, you may be a resident of the United States, and you may be part-American in the sense that many individuals are part-German or part-Dutch, but you are not an American in any legitimate sense of the word, regardless of what ideas and ideals and propositions you happen to hold in your heart at the moment.
A half-African, half-Asian child will likely be more athletic than the average Asian and more intelligent than the average African. On the other hand, it will probably be less intelligent than the average Asian and less athletic than the average African.
Imagine if the British had fought WWII this way. The Swastika would still be flying over Westminster. You don't win a war by not fighting it. You don't save your nation by welcoming refugees, migrants, and invaders. You don't survive by electing immigrants as your leaders.
Reconquista 2.0 or Sharia. That is the choice facing the West.
If Kansas City doesn't want whites, then whites should reduce Kansas City's white population to zero: The trick, of course, is to prevent the diversity from following.
And if you doubt that this is a conscious invasion and conquest, keep in mind that in living memory, the US federal government rounded up its Japanese citizens for fear of an invasion by Japan, a nation of 73 million that was separated by more than five thousand miles of the Pacific Ocean.
There are now already 60 million members of La Raza Cósmica resident in the USA, 45 million more than in 1980. And the vast majority have no more interest in the Constitution, the Rights of Englishmen, or the national interest of Americans than the Shōwa Japanese did.
Nations are people. They are not ideas, borders or political boundaries. Change the people, change the nation. Change the people, and all of the ideas, borders, and political boundaries will inevitably change with them. Demographics is destiny. ...
Assimilation is not assent to an idea. It is not mimicking behavior or learning the language or parroting words. Assimilation means interbreeding for multiple generations until your genes are no longer detectable amidst the host population. And assimilation is impossible for large quantities of immigrants.
First, there is no such thing as marital rape. Once consent is formally given in public ceremony, it cannot be revoked; the form in which marital consent is revoked is well-established. It is called divorce.
I've yet to run into a woman who is able to even try to defend female suffrage on any basis beyond a) personal feelings, b) "fairness", and c) an appeal to the Unicorn of Equality.
I have three main objections to strong female characters. First, the basic concept is a lie. Barring mystical powers or divine heritage, the strong female character is simply nonsense. They don't exist, they aren't convincingly imagined or portrayed, and they're essentially nothing more than token feminist propaganda devices. Freud would, in this case correctly, put the whole phenomenon down to penis envy.
Women do not write hard science fiction today because so few can hack the physics, so they either write romance novels in space about strong, beautiful, independent and intelligent but lonely women who finally fall in love with rugged men who love them just as they are, or stick to fantasy where they can make things up without getting hammered by critics holding triple Ph.D.s in molecular engineering, astrophysics and Chaucer.
Apparently diversity isn't turning out to be as quite as "good for the Jews" as it's been advertised. But there is no pressing cause for concern, I'm sure that the third worlders invading America will be much better behaved than the third worlders invading Europe.
How shocking it is to discover that despite the magic of geography and high quality infrastructure, African-Americans did not magically transform into 1950s-style tax-paying, economically sufficient white people. Interestingly enough, it has only taken my ruthless Aztec cousins 27 years to ethnically cleanse Compton of most of its African-Americans. What was a white city in 1948 and a black city in 1988 is now 65 percent La Raza, 32.9 percent black, and 0.8 percent white.
That's what diversity in future America looks like, cuckservatives. One without white people. Good luck with that. It's also why I think it is spectacularly funny that white SJWs believe one has to be a white supremacist in order to hate blacks. You'd think they never met an Arab, an Asian, or a Mexican.
He's oily, too. His favorite thing to do when confronted about his more extreme statements is to immediately disavow them, or accuse his detractors of having poor reading comprehension or being unable to separate rhetoric from dialectic. In other words, "when I said 'they have to go' I didn't actually say anything in support of making that happen."
Which is why, ultimately, I think it's most likely he's just a professional troll. He knows how to whip up his fanbase, his "Dread Ilk," usually through incendiary writing that attracts the ire of his hated SJWs, resulting in embarrassing slapfights with intellectual welterweights like John Scalzi that he can be sure to profit from when he inevitably publishes another book about SJW this and cuck that. Hell, he'd probably love this post. When attempting to debate with actual experts, the results are
less impressive.