It is often stated that the problem with Christianity is Christians (and considering the theology of Christianity, this is really a truism).
Of course, the scientific method has a similar issue, that is to say scientists.
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2 ... tivity.php
The problem with the scientific method
-
- Posts: 1698
- Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2014 11:14 pm
Re: The problem with the scientific method
The instances mentioned in that article are actually ones where the scientific method was abandoned.
As an analytical tool, the scientific method may well be fool-proof. The problem is when a philosophy, also named science, interferes
As an analytical tool, the scientific method may well be fool-proof. The problem is when a philosophy, also named science, interferes
- Rich
- Posts: 2592
- Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 8:11 pm
Re: The problem with the scientific method
Nature evolves a better fool.BDK wrote:The instances mentioned in that article are actually ones where the scientific method was abandoned.
As an analytical tool, the scientific method may well be fool-proof. The problem is when a philosophy, also named science, interferes
A weak government usually remains a servant of citizens, while a strong government usually becomes the master of its subjects.
- paraphrased from several sources
A choice, not an echo. - Goldwater campaign, 1964
- paraphrased from several sources
A choice, not an echo. - Goldwater campaign, 1964
- Vonz90
- Posts: 4731
- Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 4:05 pm
Re: The problem with the scientific method
That is kind of my point.BDK wrote:The instances mentioned in that article are actually ones where the scientific method was abandoned.
As an analytical tool, the scientific method may well be fool-proof. The problem is when a philosophy, also named science, interferes
-
- Posts: 6149
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 9:17 am
Re: The problem with the scientific method
There is absolutely nothing wrong with the scientific method, so long as it is used rigorously according to its intended use, to test a hypothesis here and now in a laboratory.
When that method is yanked out and stapled onto prognostications about the distant past or distant future, as if that could ever work, it is utterly worthless, unless your goal from the outset was to illustrate the assumptions and prejudices of the author(s), rather than reveal objective truth.
If you want to examine history, the proper method is the legal-historical method, the same way we try cases in court.
If you're gazing into the future, the difference in results obtained between the use of a slide rule, a crystal ball, a supercomputer, and a ouija board is generally unmeasurable with existing instrumentation. In fact, as a rule, most computer models of that sort generally do worse than one would obtain by tossing a coin and guessing the result, or throwing darts at a board blindfolded.
Scientists are only scientists when they're doing science scientifically.
When they're prognosticating beyond the realm of science, knowingly, they are talking out their asses, and hiding behind a degree.
Aliens Cause Global Warming - A Caltech Michelin Lecture by Michael Crichton
When that method is yanked out and stapled onto prognostications about the distant past or distant future, as if that could ever work, it is utterly worthless, unless your goal from the outset was to illustrate the assumptions and prejudices of the author(s), rather than reveal objective truth.
If you want to examine history, the proper method is the legal-historical method, the same way we try cases in court.
If you're gazing into the future, the difference in results obtained between the use of a slide rule, a crystal ball, a supercomputer, and a ouija board is generally unmeasurable with existing instrumentation. In fact, as a rule, most computer models of that sort generally do worse than one would obtain by tossing a coin and guessing the result, or throwing darts at a board blindfolded.
Scientists are only scientists when they're doing science scientifically.
When they're prognosticating beyond the realm of science, knowingly, they are talking out their asses, and hiding behind a degree.
Aliens Cause Global Warming - A Caltech Michelin Lecture by Michael Crichton
"There are four types of homicide: felonious, accidental, justifiable, and praiseworthy." -Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"
- mekender
- Posts: 13189
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 9:31 pm
Re: The problem with the scientific method
And Aesop comes in to link the exact same speech I was going to when I read the first post.
“I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democrat Party has adopted our platform.” - Norman Thomas, a six time candidate for president for the Socialist Party, 1944
-
- Posts: 6149
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 9:17 am
Re: The problem with the scientific method
It's a rhetorical masterpiece and a modern classic, should be required reading annually for all STEM majors in college/university, and a dirty damned shame it wasn't videotaped in the first place to live on YouTube forever.
I have a feeling when he gave it, even at Caltech, he pissed on a lot of people's cornflakes (and research grant money).
I have a feeling when he gave it, even at Caltech, he pissed on a lot of people's cornflakes (and research grant money).
"There are four types of homicide: felonious, accidental, justifiable, and praiseworthy." -Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"