Louisville Man Shoots Down Drone

This forum is for discussion of politics, diplomacy, law, and justice
Post Reply
User avatar
skb12172
Posts: 7310
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 12:45 am

Louisville Man Shoots Down Drone

Post by skb12172 »

Hovering over his property. Read the article. The cops give him shit over having and carrying a shotgun legally, then arrest him.

Link
Last edited by skb12172 on Tue Jul 28, 2015 11:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
There must be an end to this intimidation by those who come to this great country, but reject its culture.
User avatar
skb12172
Posts: 7310
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 12:45 am

Re: Louisville Man Shoots Down Drone

Post by skb12172 »

Hovering low enough to look under the cover to his porch? I would have done the same. Read the comments. They will never convict him. Besides, for that area he broke no laws.
There must be an end to this intimidation by those who come to this great country, but reject its culture.
User avatar
Termite
Posts: 9003
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:32 am

Re: Louisville Man Shoots Down Drone

Post by Termite »

Jericho941 wrote:Sometimes, stupid does hurt.
If it was below 500ft AGL, and if he shot it down with birdshot it definitely was, then the drone operators were violating FAA regs. It was definitely NOT being operated line-of-sight, it was being operated using a camera linked to a HUD or similiar remote control.

Is he guilty of discharging a firearm in a residential area? Sure. But if you hover your drone over my buddy Keith's home pool while his 16 yr old daughter is tanning or swimming, he'll shoot your toy down too.

Incidences like this are why the FAA wants to license drone operators.
"Life is a bitch. Shit happens. Adapt, improvise, and overcome. Acknowledge it, and move on."
User avatar
Netpackrat
Posts: 13986
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:04 pm

Re: Louisville Man Shoots Down Drone

Post by Netpackrat »

Good for him.
Cognosce teipsum et disce pati

"People come and go in our lives, especially the online ones. Some leave a fond memory, and some a bad taste." -Aesop
User avatar
Weetabix
Posts: 6106
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:04 pm

Re: Louisville Man Shoots Down Drone

Post by Weetabix »

Netpackrat wrote:Good for him.
+1

I wonder if he'll set up a kick starter defense fund. I'd consider kicking in on that.
Note to self: start reading sig lines. They're actually quite amusing. :D
User avatar
Jered
Posts: 7859
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:30 am

Re: Louisville Man Shoots Down Drone

Post by Jered »

Seems like the drone owner needs to be defenestrated for jackassery.

This guy deserves a medal.
The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote.
User avatar
Kommander
Posts: 3761
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:13 am

Re: Louisville Man Shoots Down Drone

Post by Kommander »

Does this mean that we need a "What Caliber for Drones" thread?
User avatar
Netpackrat
Posts: 13986
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:04 pm

Re: Louisville Man Shoots Down Drone

Post by Netpackrat »

Not sure I follow the logic by which it's OK to trespass on somebody's property and/or pursue voyeurism, if you use a machine to do it. But clearly, if it is deemed unacceptable to fire upon unwanted drones, and the right to operate a drone in violation of property rights is held to be a thing, the solution is an anti-drone drone.
Cognosce teipsum et disce pati

"People come and go in our lives, especially the online ones. Some leave a fond memory, and some a bad taste." -Aesop
User avatar
Denis
Posts: 6570
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 5:29 am

Re: Louisville Man Shoots Down Drone

Post by Denis »

"It was hovering over top of my property, and I shot it out of the sky."

It wasn't long before the drone's owners appeared.

"Four guys came over to confront me about it, and I happened to be armed, so that changed their minds," Merideth said.

A short time later, Merideth said the police arrived.

"There were some words exchanged there about my weapon, and I was open carry – it was completely legal," he said. "Long story short, after that, they took me to jail for wanton endangerment first degree and criminal mischief...because I fired the shotgun into the air."

Merideth said he was disappointed with the police response.
Note his mistake? He wasn't the first to call the police, thus ignoring the first principle of criminal law - "who phones wins". If he had called 911 immediately when his daughter saw the drone and reported a hovering peeping tom, and announced his intention to bring it down if it continued observing his minor female child, the boot would be on the other foot now. Instead, we have:
Merideth was arrested and charged with first degree criminal mischief and first degree wanton endangerment.
Post Reply