Page 7 of 7

Re: FBI recommends no charges against Clinton

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 11:03 am
by Netpackrat

Re: FBI recommends no charges against Clinton

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 3:31 pm
by Greg
Netpackrat wrote:Shocking....
Notice he gave the immunity deals to Clinton's aides *after* writing up the 'not pressing charges' memo.

It managed to do 2 things:

1) Help make the sham investigation more convincing - ooh he's granting immunity, he's trying to get them to spill something. So to sell the fix, which was definitely in.
2) No, this was to make sure the aides knew they were in the clear so they *wouldn't* spill anything in some attempt to shift blame from themselves. Make sure the whitewash held.

How exactly is *Comey* not in, or under, a prison?

Re: FBI recommends no charges against Clinton

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 8:58 pm
by scipioafricanus
Greg wrote:
Netpackrat wrote:Shocking....
Notice he gave the immunity deals to Clinton's aides *after* writing up the 'not pressing charges' memo.

It managed to do 2 things:

1) Help make the sham investigation more convincing - ooh he's granting immunity, he's trying to get them to spill something. So to sell the fix, which was definitely in.
2) No, this was to make sure the aides knew they were in the clear so they *wouldn't* spill anything in some attempt to shift blame from themselves. Make sure the whitewash held.

How exactly is *Comey* not in, or under, a prison?
Question: Shouldn't a prosecutor be the only one that can offer immunity?

Re: FBI recommends no charges against Clinton

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 10:26 pm
by Precision
Question is ... how long until America returns to its roots of tar and feathering such cretins?

Re: FBI recommends no charges against Clinton

Posted: Sun Sep 03, 2017 12:18 pm
by MiddleAgedKen
Be a while yet...the fridge is full and the ball game is on.