Two former college roommates, both logicians, meet at a conference after many years without contact. While catching up, the two eventually get around to discussing their children. The first logician asks the second how many children he has, and what their ages are. The second replies that he has 3 children, but (ever the logician) he will only reveal clues about their ages. The first logician must deduce for himself the ages of the second's children.
"First," says the logician, "the product of my children's ages is 36."
"Second, the sum of their ages is the same as our apartment number in college."
"Third, my oldest child has red hair."
Upon hearing the third clue, the first logician replies at once with the ages of his friend's children. What are they? How do you know?
Logic puzzle
- Cybrludite
- Posts: 5048
- Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:13 am
Logic puzzle
"If it ain't the Devil's Music, you ain't doin' it right." - Chris Thomas King
"When liberal democracies collapse, someone comes along who promises to make the trains run on time if we load the right people into them." - Tam K.
"When liberal democracies collapse, someone comes along who promises to make the trains run on time if we load the right people into them." - Tam K.
- evan price
- Posts: 1912
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 10:24 am
Re: Logic puzzle
One problem is that we have to assume whole ages, if we allow for example one kid to be 2-1/2 it kind of mucks the maths up. A lot.Cybrludite wrote:Two former college roommates, both logicians, meet at a conference after many years without contact. While catching up, the two eventually get around to discussing their children. The first logician asks the second how many children he has, and what their ages are. The second replies that he has 3 children, but (ever the logician) he will only reveal clues about their ages. The first logician must deduce for himself the ages of the second's children.
"First," says the logician, "the product of my children's ages is 36."
"Second, the sum of their ages is the same as our apartment number in college."
"Third, my oldest child has red hair."
Upon hearing the third clue, the first logician replies at once with the ages of his friend's children. What are they? How do you know?
The third clue says there is an oldest, so if there are twins it isn't the oldest one.
The only ages that have an "oldest" would be:
AGES SUM
1x1x36 (38)
1x2x18 (21)
1x3x12 (16)
1x4x9 (14)
2x2x9 (13)
2x3x6 (11)
3x3x4 (10)
Beyond this point I am at a loss because any one of those sums could be an apartment number.
Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc
http://ohioccwforums.org/
Ohioans for Concealed Carry:THE source for Ohio CCW information and discussion!
http://ohioccwforums.org/
Ohioans for Concealed Carry:THE source for Ohio CCW information and discussion!
- George guy
- Posts: 952
- Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 9:53 pm
Re: Logic puzzle
The logicians had a mutual redheaded acquaintance in college, which establishes a time window for conceiving a red-headed child.
'Regulate' used to mean the opposite of 'constipate.'
- Durham68
- Posts: 1044
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:36 am
Re: Logic puzzle
You missed one.evan price wrote:One problem is that we have to assume whole ages, if we allow for example one kid to be 2-1/2 it kind of mucks the maths up. A lot.Cybrludite wrote:Two former college roommates, both logicians, meet at a conference after many years without contact. While catching up, the two eventually get around to discussing their children. The first logician asks the second how many children he has, and what their ages are. The second replies that he has 3 children, but (ever the logician) he will only reveal clues about their ages. The first logician must deduce for himself the ages of the second's children.
"First," says the logician, "the product of my children's ages is 36."
"Second, the sum of their ages is the same as our apartment number in college."
"Third, my oldest child has red hair."
Upon hearing the third clue, the first logician replies at once with the ages of his friend's children. What are they? How do you know?
The third clue says there is an oldest, so if there are twins it isn't the oldest one.
The only ages that have an "oldest" would be:
AGES SUM
1x1x36 (38)
1x2x18 (21)
1x3x12 (16)
1x4x9 (14)
1x6x6 (13)
2x2x9 (13)
2x3x6 (11)
3x3x4 (10)
Beyond this point I am at a loss because any one of those sums could be an apartment number.
"Unattended children will be given an espresso and a puppy"
-
- Posts: 8486
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:15 pm
Re: Logic puzzle
Nope, because we know the oldest is a singleton, not twins. (It's one of the few things we do know.)Durham68 wrote:You missed one.evan price wrote:One problem is that we have to assume whole ages, if we allow for example one kid to be 2-1/2 it kind of mucks the maths up. A lot.Cybrludite wrote:Two former college roommates, both logicians, meet at a conference after many years without contact. While catching up, the two eventually get around to discussing their children. The first logician asks the second how many children he has, and what their ages are. The second replies that he has 3 children, but (ever the logician) he will only reveal clues about their ages. The first logician must deduce for himself the ages of the second's children.
"First," says the logician, "the product of my children's ages is 36."
"Second, the sum of their ages is the same as our apartment number in college."
"Third, my oldest child has red hair."
Upon hearing the third clue, the first logician replies at once with the ages of his friend's children. What are they? How do you know?
The third clue says there is an oldest, so if there are twins it isn't the oldest one.
The only ages that have an "oldest" would be:
AGES SUM
1x1x36 (38)
1x2x18 (21)
1x3x12 (16)
1x4x9 (14)
1x6x6 (13)
2x2x9 (13)
2x3x6 (11)
3x3x4 (10)
Beyond this point I am at a loss because any one of those sums could be an apartment number.
Anyway, this is a pretty lousy puzzle.
Maybe we're just jaded, but your villainy is not particularly impressive. -Ennesby
If you know what you're doing, you're not learning anything. -Unknown
Sanity is the process by which you continually adjust your beliefs so they are predictively sound. -esr
If you know what you're doing, you're not learning anything. -Unknown
Sanity is the process by which you continually adjust your beliefs so they are predictively sound. -esr
-
- Posts: 4286
- Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 9:41 pm
Re: Logic puzzle
If we assume the first logician needed the third clue to solve the problem, the answer would be 2-2-9 because 13 is the only sum that comes up twice.Greg wrote:Nope, because we know the oldest is a singleton, not twins. (It's one of the few things we do know.)Durham68 wrote:You missed one.evan price wrote: One problem is that we have to assume whole ages, if we allow for example one kid to be 2-1/2 it kind of mucks the maths up. A lot.
The third clue says there is an oldest, so if there are twins it isn't the oldest one.
The only ages that have an "oldest" would be:
AGES SUM
1x1x36 (38)
1x2x18 (21)
1x3x12 (16)
1x4x9 (14)
1x6x6 (13)
2x2x9 (13)
2x3x6 (11)
3x3x4 (10)
Beyond this point I am at a loss because any one of those sums could be an apartment number.
Anyway, this is a pretty lousy puzzle.
- evan price
- Posts: 1912
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 10:24 am
Re: Logic puzzle
We can't make that assumption because all the clues are presented in sequence with no specific distinction as to how they impact the problem our that they must be needed in an order.
Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc
http://ohioccwforums.org/
Ohioans for Concealed Carry:THE source for Ohio CCW information and discussion!
http://ohioccwforums.org/
Ohioans for Concealed Carry:THE source for Ohio CCW information and discussion!
- Cybrludite
- Posts: 5048
- Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:13 am
Re: Logic puzzle
You do need all three clues, otherwise they logically wouldn't have included them. Take them in the order given.evan price wrote:We can't make that assumption because all the clues are presented in sequence with no specific distinction as to how they impact the problem our that they must be needed in an order.
"If it ain't the Devil's Music, you ain't doin' it right." - Chris Thomas King
"When liberal democracies collapse, someone comes along who promises to make the trains run on time if we load the right people into them." - Tam K.
"When liberal democracies collapse, someone comes along who promises to make the trains run on time if we load the right people into them." - Tam K.
- g-man
- Posts: 1430
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:40 pm
Re: Logic puzzle
First clue gives us the list of possibles- Prime factoring of 36 is 2x2x3x3. This gives all possible age combinations as (with sums) would be exactly what Greg listed:
1x1x36 (38)
1x2x18 (21)
1x3x12 (16)
1x4x9 (14)
1x6x6 (13)
2x2x9 (13)
2x3x6 (11)
3x3x4 (10)
This lists all possibilities for the ages, with subsequent clues acting to define subsets of this list of all possibles. Their order is irrelevant to the 1st logician, but he does need all the clues.
Second clue: Sum of ages = Apt #.
The logician already knows the apartment number is 13. We don't. Because he doesn't answer, this means there must be two combinations which sum to the correct apartment number, thus giving:
1x6x6 (13)
2x2x9 (13)
Third clue: There is an oldest.
The moments-older 6 y/o twin would likely not be referred to as 'the oldest' and in the context of a logician riddle, the 9 y/o becomes the obvious correct choice, giving 2,2, and 9 as the ages.
************************************
Had the clues been given in a different order, this would give us the following:
Second clue: There is an oldest.
This eliminates the 1,6,6 combination only, leaving the rest of the list.
Third clue: Sum = apt #.
Logician already knows it's 13, so 2,2,9 is instantly the answer. WE can deduce this as well, since the only thing eliminated by the (alternate) 2nd clue was the other combination which summed to 13.
In either order, the logician needs all 3 clues.
1x1x36 (38)
1x2x18 (21)
1x3x12 (16)
1x4x9 (14)
1x6x6 (13)
2x2x9 (13)
2x3x6 (11)
3x3x4 (10)
This lists all possibilities for the ages, with subsequent clues acting to define subsets of this list of all possibles. Their order is irrelevant to the 1st logician, but he does need all the clues.
Second clue: Sum of ages = Apt #.
The logician already knows the apartment number is 13. We don't. Because he doesn't answer, this means there must be two combinations which sum to the correct apartment number, thus giving:
1x6x6 (13)
2x2x9 (13)
Third clue: There is an oldest.
The moments-older 6 y/o twin would likely not be referred to as 'the oldest' and in the context of a logician riddle, the 9 y/o becomes the obvious correct choice, giving 2,2, and 9 as the ages.
************************************
Had the clues been given in a different order, this would give us the following:
Second clue: There is an oldest.
This eliminates the 1,6,6 combination only, leaving the rest of the list.
Third clue: Sum = apt #.
Logician already knows it's 13, so 2,2,9 is instantly the answer. WE can deduce this as well, since the only thing eliminated by the (alternate) 2nd clue was the other combination which summed to 13.
In either order, the logician needs all 3 clues.
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum